Q: What are the risks of opting for a trial instead of accepting a plea deal?
Opting for a trial instead of accepting a plea deal carries several significant risks under California law. One of the primary risks is the possibility of receiving a harsher sentence if convicted at trial. While a plea deal often offers a more lenient sentence and the opportunity for reduced charges, a trial verdict may lead to the maximum penalties allowed by law, including incarceration and fines.
Another risk associated with going to trial is the unpredictability of jury verdicts. Trials can be lengthy and complex, and there is no guarantee that the jury will side with the defendant. A guilty verdict can result in a criminal record, which can have long-lasting repercussions on one’s personal and professional life. Additionally, the emotional and financial toll of a trial can be substantial, as legal fees accumulate, and individuals may need to take time off work to prepare and attend court.
Furthermore, if the defendant loses at trial, they may have limited options for appeal, especially if the evidence presented against them was substantial. It’s crucial to weigh these risks carefully against the specifics of the case, including the strength of the prosecution’s evidence, potential defenses, and personal circumstances that could influence the outcome. Consulting with an experienced attorney can provide valuable insights into the benefits and risks of pursuing a trial versus accepting a plea deal.