Q: How can DUI field sobriety tests be contested in court?
Contesting DUI field sobriety tests in court can involve several strategies. One primary avenue is to challenge the officer’s administration of the tests. According to themeehanlawfirm.com, field sobriety tests must be conducted according to specific protocols set forth by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). If the officer failed to adhere to these protocols, this could be grounds for contesting the validity of the test results. For instance, ambient conditions such as inadequate lighting or uneven surfaces could affect a person’s performance, thereby raising questions about the reliability of the test results.
Another approach to contesting field sobriety tests is by questioning the training and qualifications of the officer who administered the tests. If the officer was not properly trained or certified to conduct field sobriety tests, it can be argued that the results are invalid. The officer’s observations and conclusions regarding the individual’s impairment must be based on standardized training, and without proper credentials, the credibility of the tests can be severely undermined.
Lastly, it is crucial to address the subjectivity inherent in field sobriety tests. These tests often depend on the officer’s interpretation of the individual’s behavior during the test. If the defense can present evidence or expert testimony demonstrating that the test’s subjective nature can lead to inconsistent conclusions, it may help to cast doubt on the prosecution’s case. Information presented in court could show that other factors—such as medical conditions, fatigue, or anxiety—may have influenced the individual’s performance on the tests, leading to an unjustified assumption of impairment.