Q: What are the potential defenses for a drug DUI charge?
In California, defenses against a drug DUI charge can include challenging the validity of the traffic stop, the accuracy of the drug tests, and the evidence of impairment. If law enforcement did not have probable cause or reasonable suspicion to initiate the stop, any evidence obtained afterward may be deemed inadmissible in court. The arresting officer must justify the stop based on observable violations or suspicious behavior; otherwise, the defense could argue that the DUI charge is baseless.
Another potential defense revolves around the reliability of the drug tests administered. If the testing methods used (such as blood or urine tests) were improperly conducted, contaminated, or if the testing equipment was not properly calibrated or maintained, this could cast doubt on the accuracy of the results. It is critical to demonstrate that the evidence presented by the prosecution regarding the presence of drugs in the system was obtained through valid and reliable means.
Furthermore, a defense could argue that the defendant was not impaired at the time of driving, even if drugs were present in their system. This could involve presenting expert testimony or evidence establishing that the level of substance detected did not impair the defendant’s ability to operate a vehicle safely. A strong defense may also highlight any medication that the defendant was legally prescribed, which could contribute to a claim of non-impaired driving under the influence of substances prescribed by a licensed professional. Each of these defenses necessitates careful investigation and presentation in court to effectively counter the prosecution’s case.