Q: What common defenses can be used in DUI drug cases in California?
In California, common defenses used in DUI drug cases often revolve around challenging the legality of the initial traffic stop, the accuracy of drug testing methods, and the interpretation of the results. One notable defense is the argument that the police did not have probable cause to stop the vehicle in the first place. If the stop is deemed illegal, any evidence obtained as a result may be inadmissible in court.
Another defense pertains to the testing process for drugs. Defendants can question the reliability and accuracy of the chemical tests conducted, such as urine or blood tests. This can involve examining the protocols followed for collecting and analyzing the samples and whether proper procedures were adhered to by law enforcement. If there is evidence of contamination or improper handling of the samples, it could undermine the prosecution’s case.
Additionally, defendants may assert that the substances found in their system were legally prescribed medications, arguing that they were not impaired while driving. This defense focuses on the distinction between having a drug in one’s system and being unable to operate a vehicle safely. If the defendant can demonstrate that they were not impaired despite the presence of the drug, it could lead to a dismissal of charges or a reduction in penalties.