Q: Which common defenses can be employed to contest evidence in a DUI case?
In contesting evidence in a DUI case, several defenses might be employed under California law. One common defense is challenging the legality of the traffic stop. If law enforcement did not have probable cause or reasonable suspicion to initiate the stop, any evidence obtained during the subsequent interaction could potentially be deemed inadmissible in court.
Another defense involves questioning the reliability of breath or blood tests. Factors such as improper administration of the tests, the calibration of the testing equipment, or the qualifications of the personnel conducting the tests can all be scrutinized. If it can be shown that the testing procedure was flawed, this may lead to the evidence being questioned or excluded.
Additionally, a defense strategy can focus on the issue of rising blood alcohol concentration (BAC). This defense posits that the individual may not have been over the legal limit at the time of driving, as their BAC may have increased after they were stopped due to the time elapsed between driving and testing. If evidence supports this claim, it can effectively weaken the prosecution’s case.
These defenses can be critical in establishing reasonable doubt and might significantly influence the outcome of a DUI case.