Q: How does the law differentiate between DUID and DUI of alcohol?
Under California law, Driving Under the Influence of Drugs (DUID) and Driving Under the Influence (DUI) of alcohol are treated as two distinct offenses, but they share some similarities in terms of their implications. DUID typically refers to operating a vehicle while impaired by drugs, which may include prescription medications, over-the-counter drugs, and illegal substances, unlike DUI, which specifically pertains to impairment from alcohol.
In California, the legal limit for blood alcohol content (BAC) for DUI offenses is 0.08%. If an individual’s BAC is at or above this threshold while driving, they can be charged with DUI. For DUID, however, there is no specific legal limit for the concentration of drugs in a person’s system. Instead, law enforcement relies on evidence of impairment due to drugs, which may involve the testimony of officers regarding the driver’s behavior, performance on field sobriety tests, and sometimes the results from drug screening tests.
Both DUID and DUI are misdemeanors under California law, with penalties that can include fines, license suspension, mandatory drug counseling, and potential jail time. However, the evidence required for conviction can differ significantly between the two. In DUI cases involving alcohol, a measurable BAC is a key component, while DUID relies more on observable impairment indicators and tests related to drug influence, making the legal approaches and defenses available for each type of offense unique.