Q: What is the difference between a “refusal” and a “failure” in breath tests?
In the context of California DUI law, the terms “refusal” and “failure” pertain to different outcomes when a defendant is asked to take a breath test.
A “refusal” occurs when an individual explicitly declines to submit to a breath test after being lawfully requested by law enforcement. Under California’s implied consent law, drivers automatically consent to chemical testing when they operate a vehicle. If someone refuses to take the breath test, they can face penalties such as a longer driver’s license suspension, increased fines, and the possibility of enhanced penalties in a DUI case.
On the other hand, a “failure” refers to a situation in which the breath test is taken, but the results indicate a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) that exceeds the legal limit. In California, a BAC of 0.08% or higher is considered driving under the influence. If a driver fails the breath test, they may also face DUI charges, leading to similar consequences as those who refuse the test. Both situations can significantly impact the driver’s legal standing and invoke serious penalties, but they stem from different actions regarding the breath-testing process.